What does this mean?
It means that there are some songs out there that sort of sucked the first go around, but when someone else tackled the same song, they did the job right and made it worth remembering. A few examples -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKG5BFLqnEY
Don't know why that one won't imbed, but whatever, we'll move on.
Marvin Gaye, great guy, amazing singer, does some solid stuff. . . . but let's compare this. . .
This classic of just soul baby making music -
https://soundcloud.com/djgammer/gammer-x-marvin-gaye-lets-get
Stick with this song, make it past the introduction, and make it to the end, and that beat with Marvin Gaye's original just sticks with you.
Either way, the rule of thumb when it comes to covers in my world is that if you're brave enough to try to cover a famous song by a professional artist, you better bring something to the table that they didn't. If you're just going to try to sound like them, it's never going to work, but if you bring something more to it and make it something interesting, THEN you're working with something that just might be better than the original. I like to take this idea and say it works for literature as well. Sure, you can take ideas off of other people and be inspired by them, and even flat out steal stories from other authors, but you have to bring your own twist to the classic otherwise there's no way that you're going to do anything of value.
No comments:
Post a Comment